Allowed

S.Jeyakrishnan v. The Management of

Madras HC8 Dec 2022WP/8282/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two writ petitions were filed challenging orders rejecting claims for encashment of 45 days of earned leave surrendered by petitioners before retirement. The respondent admitted liability but cited financial difficulty. The court recorded the respondent's undertaking to pay within twelve weeks and disposed of the petitions accordingly without costs.

What did the court decide?

Respondent directed to pay eligible encashment of earned leave surrendered by petitioners within twelve weeks of receiving the order.

S.Jeyakrishnan Vs The Management of — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.Nos.8282 & 8285 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED:08.12.2022

¶4

Coram

¶5

The HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.Nos.8282 & 8285 of 2021 and W.M.P.Nos.8821 & 8824 of 2021

¶7

W.P.No.8282 of 2021

¶8

S.Jeyakrishnan .. Petitioner

¶9

¶10

The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., Coimbatore Region, Rep. By its General Manager, Coimbatore. .. Respondent

¶11

W.P.No.8285 of 2021 K.Sivaraj .. Petitioner

¶12

¶13

The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., Coimbatore Region, Rep. By its General Manager, Coimbatore. .. Respondent

¶14

Prayer in WP No.8282 of 2021: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records from the respondent relating to the

¶15

1/5

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

W.P.Nos.8282 & 8285 of 2021

¶18

impugned order passed in Pa.No.L3/W.No.30833/19UM (Tho) TNSTC (Ko) 2020 dated 28.02.20, quash the same and directing the respondent to pay the petitioner the amount payable towards the encashment of 45 days of earned leave, surrendered by him in the years before the petitioner's retirement as admitted by the respondent, either based on his monthly wages of the respective months of surrender of those earned leave, together with 18% interest p.a from the respective due dates or based on the monthly wages payable on the month of his retirement, together with 18% interest from the date of his retirement and also with cost for his litigation as may be fixed by this Court.

¶19

Prayer in WP No.8285 of 2021: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records from the respondent relating to the impugned order passed in Pa.No.L3/W.No.30834/19UM (Tho) TNSTC (Ko) 2020 dated 28.02.20, quash the same and directing the respondent to pay the petitioner the amount payable towards the encashment of 45 days of earned leave, surrendered by him in the years before the petitioner's retirement as admitted by the respondent, either based on his monthly wages of the respective months of surrender of those earned leave, together with 18% interest p.a from the respective due dates or based on the monthly wages payable on the month of his retirement, together with 18% interest from the date of his retirement and also with cost for his litigation as may be fixed by this Court.

¶20

2/5

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.Nos.8282 & 8285 of 2021

¶23

For Petitioner	:	Mr.Ajay Khose (in both writ petitions)
For Respondents	:	Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan Standing Counsel (in both writ petitions)

¶24

COMMON ORDER

¶25

The petitioners have challenged the impugned order dated 28.02.2020 passed by the respondent rejecting the petitioners' request for encashment of 45 days of earned leave surrendered by them while they were in service with the respondent corporation on the ground that due to the present financial position, the respondent is unable to make the payment.

¶26

As seen from the impugned order, the respondent has admitted their liability to the petitioners but have expressed their difficulty in making the payment only due to their present financial condition.

¶27

Learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent would now submit on instructions that the respondent shall pay the eligible amount to the petitioners for the earned leave surrendered by

¶28

3/5

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.Nos.8282 & 8285 of 2021

¶31

them, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The said undertaking given by the respondent is recorded.

¶32

Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondent to pay the eligible encashment of earned leave surrendered by the petitioners within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

08.12.2022

Index:Yes/No mmi

The General Manager, The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., Coimbatore Region, Coimbatore.

¶37

4/5

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

W.P.Nos.8282 & 8285 of 2021

¶40

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

¶41

mmi

¶42

W.P.Nos.8282 & 8285 of 2021

¶43

08.12.2022

¶44

5/5

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Jeyakrishnan v. The Management of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Jeyakrishnan v. The Management of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Sundararajan Vs The District Collector

S.Priya Vs Secretary to the Government

T.Senthil Kumar Vs Chennai Metro Rail Ltd.

M.Varadharajan Vs TamilNadu Civil supplies corportion

K.Selvam, Vs The Secretary to Government

S.Prathap Kumar Vs Government of Tamil Nadu