the petitioner's community certificate, namely, Hindu Kattunayakan-Scheduled Tribe obtained by him from the Tahsildar, Coimbatore, it has been mentioned that when the petitioner has obtained Hindu Kattunayakan Community Certificate claiming him as ''Kattu Naicken-Scheduled Tribe'' even as per the School Transfer Certificate issued by the Headmaster, Sri Ramakrishna Mission Higher Secondary School (Main), Madras South, Madras, it is not known how the petitioner can obtain two more community certificates for his daughters as ''Hindu Adi Dravidar-Scheduled Caste''. In support of his argument, drawing our notice to the impugned order argued that when the petitioner is having two daughters by name Selvi S.Soundarya, in the copy of the Community Certificate bearing No.5926609 issued by the Tahsildar, Salem, her caste has been mentioned as Hindu-Adi Dravidar (SC) vide 5565/B2 dated 20.11.2009 and the petitioner has also obtained Community Certificate bearing No.5926610 for his second daughter S.Nishanthi issued by the Tahsildar, Salem showing her caste as Hindu-Adi-Dravidar (SC) vide 5566/2009/B2 dated 20.11.2009. The irony of this case is that when the petitioner's father belongs to Hindu Kattunayakan Community, the children born to the same parents cannot belong to different community. That apart, it appears that the petitioner's wife belongs to Backward Class Community. In one family, when father belongs to Kattu Naicker Scheduled Tribe Community, mother belongs to Backward Class Community, therefore, obtaining another community certificate to two daughters as Scheduled Caste is highly unacceptable.
