The petitioner sought a direction to grant parole to her husband, a life convict. The court found the prayer infructuous and dismissed the writ petition without costs.
Petitioner's prayer for parole is deemed infructuous; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.04.2022
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
Writ Petition No.7073 of 2022
K.Eswari W/o.B.Kumar .. Petitioner/Wife of the detenue
Vs.
The Secretary to the Government,
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the respondents to grant parole for 10 days to petitioner's husband one B.Kumar s/o.Balasubramaniam, Life Convict, CT.No.15145, aged about 60 years, now confined at Central Prison, Cuddalore, in pursuant to petitioner's representation dated 15.03.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanan
For Respondents: Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
[Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH, J]
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
gm
To
Writ Petition No.7073 of 2022
NRJK(CO) A.SK(20/04/2022)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking grant of parole to a life convict is maintainable when the prayer has become infructuous.
K.Eswari
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Inspector General of Prison
The Superintendent of Prison
P.N.PRAKASH
A.A.NAKKIRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
