3.Mr.K.V.Sajeevkumar, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 4 submitted that the first petitioner, who is the second wife of K.R.S.Manicka Mudaliar, is the mother of the second petitioner and respondents 5 and 6 are children born to Manicka Mudaliar and his first wife. After his demise, the petitioners and 2 others, namely, brothers of the second petitioner, have filed an Original Suit in O.S. No.83 of 2017 for partition and as against the dismissal, First Appeal in A.S. No.635 of 2019 filed by the petitioners, was pending for final disposal. Thereafter, the seventh respondent herein also filed W.P. No.16021 of 2020 challenging the impugned notice dated 21.10.2020 bearing Na.Ka.No.2180/2020/F1 issued by the Commissioner, Tiruvannamalai Municipality to quash the same with a further direction to the first respondent to consider the regularisation application dated 25.10.2018 and the same was dismissed by order dated 11.12.2020 on the premise that there was nothing to show that the petitioner therein had approached the first respondent seeking for regularisation of the building and there was no ground to interfere with the notice issued by the first respondent. Again Writ Petition Nos.18151 and 18153 of 2020 were filed by respondents 5 and 6, questioning the very same impugned notice dated 21.10.2020. This Court, by order dated 12.12.2020, dismissed the same, in view of the order passed in W.P. No.16021 of 2020 dated 11.12.2020. Therefore the petitioners need not have come to this Court.
