D.Srinivasan v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition seeking a mandate to transfer a Patta, the Madras High Court closed the petition without adjudication after the respondent submitted that the Patta had already been issued and the petitioner ratified this.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :29.03.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI
W.P. No.5384 of 2022
D.Srinivasan
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. ...Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to transfer the Patta in the name of the petitioner herein for the land measuring an extent of 1.16 Cents comprised in Survey No.695/6, Patta No.37, at No.57, Kazhiyur Village, Cheyyaru Taluk, Thiruvannamali District, situated within the office of the joint Sub Registrar No.II, Thiruvathipuram and Registration District of Thiruvannamalai.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition requires adjudication given the submission that the Patta has already been issued to the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. Srinivasan
- respondent
The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai District
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court