The High Court of Judicature at Madras disposed of W.P. No. 4453 of 2018. The petitioner contended for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of a representation. The court held the prayer infructuous and dismissed the petition with no costs.
No relief granted. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.NO.4453 OF 2018
K.S.Subbaiah ... Petitioner
.Vs.
(R3 impleaded vide order dated 23.03.2018 in W.M.P.No.6058 of 2018) ... Respondents
PRAYER:-
This Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 22.01.2018.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vijayakumar For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan 1 & 2 Special Government Pleader For Respondent-3 : Mr.T.Easwaradhas
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
infructuous. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rsi
To
W.P.NO.4453 OF 2018
SV(CO) PBS/04/07/2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus to dispose of a representation became infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.S. Subbaiah
The Inspector General of Registration
The Sub Registrar, Velachery
Madhavan
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
