Disposed

B.Nandakumar v. the Commissioner

Madras HC14 Nov 2022WP/3924/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petition was a writ petition under Article 226 seeking removal of illegal constructions. The petitioner withdrew the petition via endorsed endorsement. The court disposed of the petition with liberty to the petitioner to work out his rights in a manner known to law.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to work out his rights in the manner known to law.

B.Nandakumar Vs the Commissioner — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P. No.3924 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 14.11.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

W.P. No.3924 of 2022

B.Nandakumar

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Commissioner Vaniyambadi Municipality Vaniyambadi Municipality Office Vaniyambadi Thirupattur District

¶11

2.The Superintendent of Police Thirupathur District Thirupathur

¶12

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vaniyambadi Sub-Division Thirupathur District

¶13

4.The Inspector of Police Vaniyambadi Town Police Station Thiruppathur District

¶14

5.Senbagavalli

¶15

6.Rajendiran

¶16

7.Nagalakshmi

¶17

8.Govindasamy

¶18

9.Samraj

¶19

.. Respondents

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶21

_________ Page 1/4_

¶22

W.P. No.3924 of 2022

¶23

PRAYER :

¶24

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to remove the illegal constructions put up by 5th to 9th respondents at petitioner's land in Old Survey No.F-23/1, Old Town Survey No.755, Ward No.F, Block No.23, New Town Survey No.1 at Devasthanam Thirumansolai Pudur Village, Vaniyambadi Town to an extent of 1.45 acres with the supervision and assistance of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th respondents.

¶25

For Petitioner : S.Balambigai Gowri For Respondents : Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath for R1 Mr.A.Selvendiran, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R2 to R4 Ms.R.T.Sundari, for R5 to R9

¶26

O R D E R

¶27

(delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

¶28

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty. She has made the following endorsement.

¶29

" The petitioner may be permitted to withdraw"

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶31

_________ Page 2/4_

¶32

W.P. No.3924 of 2022

¶33

In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the

¶34

learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to work out his rights, in the manner known to law. No costs.

¶35

[R.S.M., J.] [K.B., J.] 14.11.2022

¶36

Index : Yes / No Asr

¶37

¶38

1.The Commissioner Vaniyambadi Municipality Vaniyambadi Municipality Office Vaniyambadi Thirupattur District

¶39

2.The Superintendent of Police Thirupathur District Thirupathur

¶40

3.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Vaniyambadi Sub-Division Thirupathur District

¶41

4.The Inspector of Police Vaniyambadi Town Police Station Thiruppathur District

¶42

5.The Government Pleader High Court, Madras

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶44

_________ Page 3/4_

¶45

W.P. No.3924 of 2022

¶46

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. AND K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

¶47

Asr

¶48

W.P. No.3924 of 2022

¶49

Date : 14.11.2022

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶51

_________ Page 4/4_

B.Nandakumar v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Nandakumar v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Kandan Vs Thge Commissioner

R.Sivakumar Vs The State Level Scrutiny Committee

Elizabeth Vs M/S Royal Sundaram Alliance Ins.Co.Ltd.

The J.K.K.Nataraj Nagar Vs Mohanasundaram

T.N.Natarajan(Died) Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by It

B.Mahalakshmi Vs Tamil Nadu State Human Rights Commission