Disposed

B.Indira v. The District Collector

Madras HC23 Feb 2022WP/3543/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court, without expressing an opinion on merits, directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.12.2021 regarding computerization of Patta for specified properties within twelve weeks of receiving the order copy disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.12.2021 within twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

B.Indira Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 23.02.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

W.P.No.3543 of 2022

B.Indira

...Petitioner

vs.

1.The District Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

¶10

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpattu Division, Chengalpattu Taluk & District.

¶11

3.The Tahsildar, Chengalpattu Taluk, Chengalpattu District.

¶12

...Respondents

¶13

PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 27.12.2021 sent for computerizing the Patta for the following properties, situated at No.68 Attur B-Block Village, Chengalpattu Taluk & District.

¶14

(a) Patta No.476 comprised in Punja Survey No.835/B1 to an extent of 0.06 cents (0.02.5 Ares) or 2613.354 sq.ft and

¶15

(b) Patta No.455 and Old village Natham Survey No.835B/ Part as per Patta New Survey No.1216/14 to an extent of 651 sq.ft or 7005 sq.ft.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

For Petitioner

¶18

: Mr.R.Thanjan

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.Chezhiyan Additional Government Pleader

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to the respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 27.12.2021 sent for computerizing the Patta for the following properties, situated at No.68 Attur B-Block Village, Chengalpattu Taluk & District.

¶22

Mr.T.Chezhiyan, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. In view of the limited relief sought for in this petition and on the consent expressed by the Learned counsel appearing on either side, this petition is taken up for final disposal.

¶23

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the property comprised in Punja Survey No.835/B1 to an extent of 0.06 cents and Natham Survey No.835/B2 to an extent of 651 sq.ft situated at No.68 Attur B-Block Village, Chengalpattu Taluk & District. Even after the purchase the computerized Patta stands in the name of the original owner, for which the petitioner made a representation on 27.12.2021 to computerize the Patta and transfer the Patta in his name. However, till date no action has been taken by the respondents on the representation made by the petitioner. Hence the present Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the above relief.

¶24

Though very many grounds have been raised, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice if this Court directs the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 27.12.2021 within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court.

¶25

The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner's application dated 27.12.2021 will be considered by the respondents within the time frame that may be fixed by this Court.

¶26

In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 27.12.2021, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction. No costs.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

Assistant Registrar (CS-IX)

¶31

//True Copy//

¶32

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶33

nhs/tri

¶34

¶35

1.The District Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

¶36

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpattu Division, Chengalpattu Taluk & District.

¶37

3.The Tahsildar, Chengalpattu Taluk, Chengalpattu District.

¶38

+1cc to Mr.R.Thanjan, Advocate SR. No. 12180

W.P.No.3543 of 2022

SVI (CO)

PR (16/03/2022)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

B.Indira v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Indira v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Subramanyam Reddy Vs The Inspector General of registration

Mr.Vee.G.Santhosh Kumar Vs the Spl.Commr. & Commr of

V.Suvarnalingam Vs the District Collector

M.Anbu Vs The District Registrar

M.Krishna Parayanar Founder Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

A.Loganathan Vs Special Deputy Collector (La)