A writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct respondents under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act was dismissed as it had been withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.NO.351 OF 2022
Juliut Mary
... Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to refer the case under section 18(1) of the land Acquisition Act to the competent court for the enhanced
compensation and pass such further or other orders as this court may deem fit.
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. A requisition letter dated 06.04.2022 has also been sent to the Registry to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
NHS
To
W.P.No.351 of 2022
SVI(CO) RLP(05/05/2022)
Juliut Mary
The Principal Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Government of Tamilnadu
The District Collector
The Special Deputy Collector
The Revenue District Officer
The Special Tahsildhar
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
