Disposed

R.Deiva v. The Managing Director

Madras HC23 Dec 2022WP/34771/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a writ petition under Article 226. The petitioner sought de-sealing of a residential property allotted by the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, pending payment of Rs. 26,000. The court directed payment by the specified office hours for de-sealing.

What did the court decide?

Payment of Rs. 26,000 on 03.01.2023 between 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM would result in de-sealing of the premises.

R.Deiva Vs The Managing Director — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.34771 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 23.12.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. V. KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

Writ Petition No.34771 of 2022

R.Devika

... Petitioner

Versus

The Managing Director, Tamil Nad Slum Clearance Board, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai – 600 005.

¶11

... Respondent

¶12

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner representation dated 26.07.2022, by de-sealing the petitioner's residential property which was allotted by the respondent in favour of the petitioner.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankrasubbu

¶14

For Respondent : Mrs.Indumathy Venkatesh (TNSCB)

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶16

W.P.No.34771 of 2022

¶17

ORDER The Writ petition has been filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus seeking consideration of a representation dated 26.07.2022, receive a sum of Rs.26,000/- which is payable by the petitioner and on such receipt, the respondent to break open and de-seal the petitioner's property and permit her to reside in the portion which had been allotted by the respondent.

¶18

The said property is situated at Door No.16, Thirumullaivoil, which has been allotted by the respondent to the petitioner. The petitioner at an earlier stage was not able to pay the said sum of Rs.26,000/- and therefore the said portion was sealed by the respondent.

¶19

Now a representation has been given by the petitioner that she is prepared to pay the said sum of Rs.26,000/-.

¶20

The petitioner may go over to the office of the respondent on 03.01.2023 between 11.00 a.m., and 2.00 p.m., along with the said sum of Rs.26,000/-. The respondent may receive the said amount and de-seal the premises. If any further compliances have to be made, put that in writing

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶22

W.P.No.34771 of 2022

¶23

and give it to the petitioner. But, at any rate, the premises must be desealed on receipt of Rs.26,000/-[Rupees Twenty Six Thousand only]. Further proceedings can be initiated separately.

¶24

With the said observation, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶25

No costs.

¶26

23.12.2022

¶27

ssi Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No

¶28

To: The Managing Director, Tamil Nad Slum Clearance Board, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai – 600 005.

¶29

C. V. KARTHIKEYAN,J.

¶30

ssi

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

W.P.No.34771 of 2022

W.P.No.34771 of 2022

23.12.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

R.Deiva v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Deiva v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Giri Sahajanya Projects Vs Tamil Nadu Generation and Distributio Corporation Ltd.

A.Cader Buhari Vs The Regional Director

B.Vatsala Vs The Member secretay

A.Kathiravan Vs The Vice chancellor

M.Vasuki, Vs The Superintending Engineer

Suresh Varadharajan Vs Regional Passport office