D. Stanly v. The Director
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the use of contract labour at Doosan Power Systems India Private Limited. The Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel.
What the court decided
W.P.No.29971 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.29971 of 2018 and
W.M.P.No.34973 of 2018
Doosan Employees Union Rep.by its General Secretary, Regn.No.512/TVR No.42, Anjaneyar Koil Street, Poonamallee
Chennai – 600 056. ...Petitioner Vs.
- 1.Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
- 2.The Joint Director, Industrial Safety and Health Department, No.9 & 10, Lal Bagadhur Sastri Street, Periakuppam, Tiruvallur – 602 001.
- 3.The Inspector of Factories, Industrial Safety and Health Department, No.9 & 10, Lal Bagadhur Sastri Street, Periakuppam, Tiruvallur – 602 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Doosan Employees Union
- respondent
Government of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
The Joint Director, Industrial Safety and Health Department
- respondent
The Inspector of Factories
- respondent
Doosan Power Systems India Private Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court