Dismissed

G.Shailaja v. The District Collector

Madras HC22 Dec 2022WP/34292/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two writ petitions challenging the non-consideration of representations for patta transfer regarding land purchased by the petitioners, this court directed the third respondent to consider the representation and pass necessary orders within eight weeks. The petitions were disposed of on merits based on this direction.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the third respondent to consider the representation dated 22.08.2022 and pass necessary orders on merits within eight weeks.

G.Shailaja Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.Nos.34292 & 34293 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 22.12.2022

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.Nos.34292 & 34293 of 2022

¶7

G.Shailaja ... Petitioner in WP.No.34292 of 2022 D.Vinodhini ... Petitioner in WP.No.34293 of 2022

¶8

¶9

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Tiruvannamalai – 606 604.

¶10

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvannamalai & Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai.

¶11

3.The Tahsildar, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai.

¶12

4.The Revenue Inspector, Paachal Sub Division, Chengam, Tiruvannamalai. ... Respondents in both WPs

¶13

Common Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to consider the petitioners' representation dated 22.08.2022 and to transfer the patta in respect of the subject property viz., all that piece and parcel of 2.96 ½ acres out of 5.93 acres of Dry

¶14

1/6

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.Nos.34292 & 34293 of 2022

¶17

Land comprised in Survey No.130/5 of Perumbakkam Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District in the petitioners' name.

¶18

In both WPs For Petitioners : Mr.M.Santhanaraman For Respondent : Mrs.N.Senthil Selvi Government Advocate

¶19

COMMON ORDER

¶20

The prayer sought for in these writ petitions is for a Writ of

¶21

Mandamus directing the respondents herein to consider the petitioners' representation dated 22.08.2022 and to transfer the patta in respect of the subject property viz., all that piece and parcel of 2.96 ½ acres out of 5.93 acres of Dry Land comprised in Survey No.130/5 of Perumbakkam Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District in the petitioners' name.

¶22

The petitioners claim that they purchased the property at S.No.130/5 situated at Perumbakkam Village, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District on 30.03.2022 and they have been registered as Document Nos.7726/2022 and 7725/2022 respectively before the concerned Registrar Office.

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

2/6

¶25

W.P.Nos.34292 & 34293 of 2022

¶26

Thereafter when the petitioners had given representations for issuance of change of patta and chitta, that have not been considered, therefore they have come to this Court seeking the aforestated prayer.

¶27

Heard Mr.M.Santhanaraman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mrs.N.Senthil Selvi, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶28

The learned Government Advocate for the respondents would submit that, the said request of the petitioners dated 22.08.2022 would be considered and necessary orders to that effect would be passed by the 3^rd respondent within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶29

Considering the said submissions made by the learned Government Advocate for the respondents and taking into account of the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court is inclined to dispose of these writ petitions with the following order:

¶30

There shall be a direction to the 3^rd respondent to

¶31

consider the representation of the petitioners dated 3/6

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

W.P.Nos.34292 & 34293 of 2022

¶34

22.08.2022 and pass necessary orders thereon on merits

¶35

and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks

¶36

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶37

With this direction, these Writ Petitions are disposed of. No

¶38

costs.

¶39

22.12.2022

¶40

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No

¶41

Sgl

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/6

¶44

W.P.Nos.34292 & 34293 of 2022

¶45

¶46

1.The District Collector, Collectorate, Tiruvannamalai – 606 604.

¶47

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvannamalai & Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai.

¶48

3.The Tahsildar, Chengam Taluk, Tiruvannamalai.

¶49

4.The Revenue Inspector, Paachal Sub Division, Chengam, Tiruvannamalai.

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

5/6

¶52

W.P.Nos.34292 & 34293 of 2022

¶53

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

¶54

Sgl

¶55

W.P.Nos.34292 & 34293 of 2022

¶56

22.12.2022

¶57

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶58

6/6

G.Shailaja v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Shailaja v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Agnalaa Vs The Inspector General of Registration

M.v.Nanjundappa Vs The Collector of Krishnagiri

R.Arularasan Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Karuppan Vs The Secretary to the Government

Karuppan Vs The Secretary to the Government

C.Kannan Vs The Deputy Inspector General of Registration