Disposed

S.Govindaraj v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC7 Dec 2022WP/32827/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking direction to the Revenue Divisional Officer to decide a pending appeal against an order cancelling a patta. The Court directed the officer to decide the appeal on merits hearing both sides within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to decide the pending appeal on merits within six weeks. No costs.

S.Govindaraj Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.32827 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07.12.2022

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

W.P.No.32827 of 2022

S.Govindaraj

... Petitioner

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Cum Sub-Divisional Magistrate Thirumangalam, Chennai.

¶11

2.The Tahsildar The Office of Tahsildar, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053.

¶12

3.K.K.Sridhar

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1^st respondent to dispose the pending Appeal in S.R.No.3425 dated 16.11.2021 against the order dated 09.07.2001 in Na.Ka.No.A1/238/220 by the 2^nd respondent based on the representation dated 09.09.2022.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Saravanan For Respondents : Mr.V.Veluchamy Addl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Mandamus directing the

¶18

1^st respondent to dispose the pending Appeal in S.R.No.3425 dated

¶19

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.32827 of 2022

¶21

16.11.2021 against the order dated 09.07.2001 in Na.Ka.No.A1/238/ 220 by the 2^nd respondent based on the representation dated 09.09.2022.

¶22

In respect of the property at Old Survey No.188/12Pa, in Block 57,

¶23

Ward A, Oragadam Village, Ambattur Circle, Chennai District, patta already been issued in the name of the petitioner.

¶24

However on the basis of the complaint given by the 3^rd respondent,

¶25

the 2^nd respondent/Tahsildar, by order dated 09.07.2021, has cancelled the patta and directed to issue the patta in favour of the 3^rd respondent. Challenging the same, the petitioner preferred appeal under Section 12 of the Patta Passbook Act, 1983 before the 1^st respondent on 16.11.2021. The said appeal is still pending before the 1^st respondent. Therefore, in order to decide the said appeal on merits at the earliest, the petitioner has moved the present writ petition.

¶26

Heard Mr.K.Saravanan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.V.Veluchamy, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2.

¶27

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.No.32827 of 2022

¶29

The learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1

¶30

and 2 would submit that, the appeal filed by the petitioner in October 2021 would be decided on merits after hearing both sides within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Court.

¶31

Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court is inclined to dispose of this writ petition with the following order:

¶32

That there shall be a direction to the 1^st respondent to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner dated 16.11.2021 as against the order passed by the 2^nd respondent dated 09.07.2021 on merits and in accordance with law after hearing both the petitioner as well as the private respondent herein within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶33

With this direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶34

07.12.2022

¶35

Index : Yes / No

¶36

Speaking Order : Yes / No Sgl

¶37

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.32827 of 2022

R. SURESH KUMAR, J.

Sgl

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Cum Sub-Divisional Magistrate Thirumangalam, Chennai.

¶43

2.The Tahsildar The Office of Tahsildar, Ambattur, Chennai – 600 053.

¶44

W.P.No.32827 of 2022

¶45

07.12.2022

¶46

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Govindaraj v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Govindaraj v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parvathy Vs the Competent Authority and

A.Vedarathinam Vs The Secretary to the Government of tamil Nadu

K.Loganathan Vs The District Collector

Karuppan Vs The Secretary to the Government

M.P.Vasanth Prabhu Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Ranganathan Vs The Tahsildar