V.Swaminathan v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal filed by Mottai and Chittu against a judgment confirming earlier orders. Bank noted non-appearance by appellants after notice. Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
S.A.No.2138 of 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
S.A.No.2138 of 2004 C.M.P.No.2284 of 2007
1.Mottai @ Ramayee 2.Chittu @ Lakshmi .. Appellants Versus
1.Venkatachalam 2.Kandasamy 3.Jayalakshmi .. Respondents
This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2003 made in A.S.No.34 of 1999 on the file of the Sub Court, Mettur confirming the judgment and decree dated 28.02.1995 made in O.S.No.601 of 1983 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Mettur.
For Appellants : No Appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.M.Devaraj For R3 : No such address
JUDGMENT
When the matter originally came up for hearing on 14.06.2022, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the appellants have
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mottai @ Ramayee
- appellant
Chittu @ Lakshmi
- respondent
Venkatachalam
- respondent
Kandasamy
- respondent
Jayalakshmi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court