Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging land acquisition proceedings. The court granted withdrawal upon counsel's submission.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.31778 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.12.2022
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.31778 of 2017
G.Chitra .. Petitioner
Vs
Page 1 of 5
W.P.No.31778 of 2017
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of declaration declaring that the entire land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in respect of the lands in Survey No.444 measuring to an extent of 1 Acre 83 cents, Villankurichi Village, Coimbatore District relates to Award dated 19.05.1997 in No.5/1997 has lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and the Settlement Act, 2013 (Act 30/2013).
For the Petitioner : Mr.P.S.Raman for Mr.G.Sankaran For the Respondents : Mr.R.Shunmugasundaram Advocate-General assisted by Mrs.C.Shymala Standing Counsel for TNHB
ORDER
(Order of the court was made by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)
Mr.P.S.Raman, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that this writ petition has been filed on a wrong advice when the original land acquisition proceedings have been quashed by this Court vide order dated 20.4.2004 passed in W.P.No.7267 of 1997 and vide order dated 22.1.2008 passed in
Page 2 of 5
W.P.No.31778 of 2017
W.P.No.4903 of 1998 and, therefore, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as no adjudication is required in the matter.
has no objection for withdrawing the writ petition.
withdrawn. There will be no order as to costs.
(T.R., ACJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 05.12.2022 Index : Yes/No bbr
Page 3 of 5
W.P.No.31778 of 2017
To:
Page 4 of 5
W.P.No.31778 of 2017
T.RAJA, ACJ. AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
bbr
W.P.No.31778 of 2017
05.12.2022
___________ Page 5 of 5_
G.Chitra
The Executive Engineer cum Administrative Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Coimbatore Housing Unit, Coimbatore
The Government of Tamil Nadu
The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Housing Scheme No.3, Coimbatore
The Tamil Nadu Housing Board
T.RAJA
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
