Petitioner sought writ of mandamus for appointment as Noon Meal Organizer. Court found she had previously challenged the selection via another writ petition which was dismissed, thereby barring her current relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.03.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 30144 of 2017 and W.M.P. No. 32749 of 2017
S.Jeeva … Petitioner
-vs-
... Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 1 to 2 to appoint the Petitioner to the post of Noon Meal Organizer in the Third Respondent school situated at Periyathellur Village, Vellore District.
For Petitioner : Mr. J.Shanmugasundara Babu
For Respondents : Mr. P.Gurunathan, Additional Government Pleader (For R1)
Mr. D.Suryanarayanan (For R2)
O R D E R
Heard Mr. J.Shanmugasundara Babu, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. P.Gurunathan, Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the First Respondent and Mr. D.Suryanarayanan, Learned Counsel for the Second Respondent and perused the materials placed on record, apart from the pleadings
of the parties.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
gd
To
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.14596
W.P.No. 30144 of 2017
JP-II(CO) CT 12/05/2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking appointment to the post of Noon Meal Organizer is maintainable in view of the dismissal of a prior petition challenging the selection?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Jeeva
The District Collector, Vellore District
The Commissioner, Vellore Panchayat Union
P. D. Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
