Karpagam v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a petition seeking to quash an FIR because the investigation in the underlying criminal case was completed and a charge sheet had been filed thereafter, rendering no adjudication necessary in this petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed with liberty to petitioners to pursue remedies known to law in trial court.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P. (MD) No.20641 of 2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
RESERVED ON 14.09.2022 DELIVERED ON 28.09.2022
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH
Crl.O.P. (MD) No.20641 of 2014 & M.P. (MD) No.1 of 2014
- 1 S.K. Rengasamy 2 R. Mathivanan 3 R. Vijayakumar 4 Kavithakala
- 5 Vidhyapriya
- 6 R. Jeyabharathi 7 Thirupathi Chettiar 8 T. Veera Raj 9 T. Ramamoorthy 10 K. Annamalai Chettiar
- 11 S. Sivanantham 12 R. Rathinam Petitioners vs.
- 1/4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Criminal Original Petition seeking to quash an FIR should be maintained after investigation is completed and a charge sheet is filed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.K. Rengasamy
- respondent
State represented by Inspector of Police
Coram
P.N. Prakash
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court