Writ petition under Article 226 challenging police interference in a civil property dispute was disposed of as infructuous because the cause for filing had vanished.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No. 26965 of 2014 and M.P.No. 1 of 2014
T.Karunanidhi
...Petitioner
Vs
...Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, f orbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 4 and 5 in respect of the property situated at R.S. No.496/1 to an extent of 0.57.5 Ares out of which 0.05 cent vacant land, R.S. No.497 to an extent of 0.23.0 Ares, R.S. No.490 to an extent of 0.29.59 Ares and R.S. No.498/2 to an extent of 0.10.0 Ares, Thiruvenkadu Village, Seerkazhi Taluk, Nagapattinam District.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sundara Pandiyan For Respondent 1 to 3 : M/s.N.Senthil Selvi Government Advocate For Respondents 4 and 5 : Mr.V.Subbarayan
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner through Video Conference Mode made a submission that the cause aroused for the purpose of filing of the present writ petition became vanished.
2. Recording the above said submission, no further adjudication is required and accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
nti/mp
To
W.P.No. 26965 of 2014
um[co]
srg 04/02/2022
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed given the change in material facts regarding the civil dispute.
Whether judicial interference in a civil dispute is appropriate.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.Karunanidhi
The Superintendent of Police
The Deputy Superintendent of Police
The Inspector of Police
Thiru.Kannan
Thiru.Kaliyaperumal
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
