The High Court dismissed the writ petition on the grounds that it had become infructuous, in light of the petitioner's counsel's submission and endorsement to that effect, without dealing with the substantive prayer regarding patta issuance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.26477 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.11.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR
W.P.No.26477 of 2018 and
W.M.P.No.30806 of 2018
1.K.Kannan
2.V.Santhosh
3.J.Parthasarathy
... Petitioners
Vs.
Page 1 of 4
W.P.No.26477 of 2018
Prayer :
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 4th Respondent to issue patta without insisting for No objection certificate from the other Respondents in the terms of our application dated 26.09.2018.
For Petitioners : Ms.R.Harishni for M/s.R.Hemalatha For R1, R2 & R4 : Mrs.M.Geetha Thamaraiselvan Special Government Pleader For R3 : No appearance
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous and she has also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
15.11.2022 (2/2)
mkn
Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Nonspeaking order
Page 2 of 4
W.P.No.26477 of 2018
To
Page 3 of 4
W.P.No.26477 of 2018
S.S. SUNDAR, J.
mkn
W.P.No.26477 of 2018
15.11.2022 (2/2)
Page 4 of 4
K.Kannan
V.Santhosh
J.Parthasarathy
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Special Tahsildar
The Tamil Nadu Housing Board
S.S. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
