S.Anitha v. The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation seeking revision of a legal heir certificate and decide it on merits within eight weeks.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2022 and decide on merits within eight weeks.
What the court decided
W.P.No.26070 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.09.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
Writ Petition No.26070 of 2022
S.Anitha
…. Petitioner
-Vs-
1.The Tahsildar Office of the Taluk Head Office Cuddalore District.
2.The Additional Deputy Tahsildar Office of the Taluk Head Office Cuddalore District. …. Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to delete the petitioner's father-in-law's name A.Subramanian in the legal heir certificate of Late S.Raja issued in Pa.Mu.(A6)-10721/2011 dated 25.10.2011 and thereby issue fresh legal heir certificate by mentioning the petitioner's name and her son's name ie., 1.S.Anitha, 2.A.R.Koushik and 3.A.R.Koushal within a stipulated time by considering the petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2022.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2022 and decide the same on merits within a stipulated time.?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Anitha
- respondent
The Tahsildar Office of the Taluk Head Office Cuddalore District
- respondent
The Additional Deputy Tahsildar Office of the Taluk Head Office Cuddalore District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court