Dismissed

V.Srinivasan v. The Director of School Education

Madras HC23 Dec 2022WP/24786/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition pending V.R.S. acceptance and liberty to challenge a recovery order later. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn but granted the requested liberty.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition if grievance regarding impugned recovery order remains unresolved after V.R.S. acceptance. No costs.

V.Srinivasan Vs The Director of School… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P. No.24786 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 23.12.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P. No.24786 of 2021 and W.M.P. No.26067 of 2021

V. Srinivasan

.. Petitioner

vs.

The Director of School Education, Chennai - 6.

¶11

The District Educational Officer, Bhavani, Erode district.

¶12

The Correspondent, St. Sebastian's Aided High School, Andiyur Taluk, Erode District - 638 505.

¶13

The Regional Accounts Officer (Auditing), School Education Department, Coimbatore. .. Respondents

¶14

Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 2nd respondent made in O.Mu.No.3349/A3/2021, dated -9-2020, signed on 21.9.2021 and quash the same and direct the 3rd

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

1/4

¶17

W.P. No.24786 of 2021

¶18

respondent to resubmit the proposal for increment to the second respondent and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to sanction the Annual Increments as and when it becomes due to the petitioner without reference to Audit objection (for not completing the Child Psychology training).

¶19

For Petitioner : Ms.Selvi George For Respondents : Mr.R.U. Dinesh Rajkumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner's V.R.S. (Voluntary Retirement from Service) application has not been accepted due to the pendency of this writ petition. The petitioner has challenged the impugned recovery order in this writ petition. The petitioner has also sought for liberty to file a fresh writ petition, once his V.R.S. is accepted by the respondents and in case, his grievance with regard to the impugned recovery order is not

¶22

redressed by the respondents.

¶23

No prejudice would be caused to any of the parties, if such a direction is issued.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/4

¶26

W.P. No.24786 of 2021

¶27

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

However, liberty as sought for by the petitioner is granted. No costs.

¶29

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶30

23.12.2022

¶31

Note : Issue order copy on 27.12.2022

¶32

Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vsi2

¶33

To :

¶34

The Director of School Education, Chennai - 6.

¶35

The District Educational Officer, Bhavani, Erode district.

¶36

The Correspondent, St. Sebastian's Aided High School, Andiyur Taluk, Erode District - 638 505.

¶37

The Regional Accounts Officer (Auditing), School Education Department, Coimbatore.

¶38

3/4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

W.P. No.24786 of 2021

¶41

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶42

vsi2

¶43

W.P. No.24786 of 2021

¶44

23.12.2022

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

4/4

V.Srinivasan v. The Director of School Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Srinivasan v. The Director of School Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Venkatesan Vs The State rep by its secretary to Government

N.Padma Vs State of Tamil Nadu

N.Padma Vs State of Tamil Nadu

M.S.Sahdhuna Bee Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Dr.Ayisha K Vs The Government of TamilNadu

Dr.Ayisha K Vs The Government of TamilNadu