Dismissed

C.Thiruvengadam, v. the Manager

Madras HC1 Dec 2022WP/24162/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions challenging the exercise of bankers lien and recovery notices. The Court held that the grievances relate to banking disputes and money recovery for which the appropriate forum is not the Writ Court, leading to dismissal of all petitions.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed; No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions closed.

C.Thiruvengadam, Vs the Manager — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.24162 of 2010

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 01.12.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.Nos.24162,24163,28233 of 2010 and 10503 and 16591of 2017

¶7

¶8

M.P.Nos.1,1 and 1 of 2010

¶9

W.P.No.24162 of 2010

C.Thiruvengadam

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Manager Indian Bank Melmalayanoor branch Gingee taluk Villupuram District

¶14

2.M/s. Rains Seizures and Ware Housing Pvt Ltd P.Box No.16 39-B, Bye pass road, Chockalinga Nagar Madurai-625 010

¶15

3.The Chief General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Rajaji Road Chennai-1 R3-suo motu impleaded as per order dated19.09.2011 by NKKJ in W.P.Nos.24162 and 24163 of 2010

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶17

Page 1 of 9

¶18

W.P.No.24162 of 2010

¶19

4.The Home Secretary of Tamilnadu Fort St.George, Chennai

¶20

5.The Director General of Police Chennai R4 and 5 suo motu impleaded as per order dated 19.08.2016 by NKKJ in W.P.s 24162,24163,28233 and 28234 of 201o in M.P.1 and 1 of 2010

¶21

... Respondents

¶22

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to return the original documents of the petitioner's lands in S.Nos.303/3,303/6,303/7,303/8,303/9,316/2,316/3,316/2B,316/1B, 318/1B2 to an extent of hectare 3-79 are at Melmalaiyanoor, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.A.E.Kalaiselvan

¶24

For Respondents : Mr.M.Balachandar for R1

¶25

Mr.V.Ravi for R2

¶26

Mr.T.Poornam for R3

¶27

Mr.P.Sathish, AGP for R4 and 5

¶28

W.P.No.24163 of 2010

B.Ganesan

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Manager

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶34

Page 2 of 9

¶35

W.P.No.24162 of 2010

¶36

Indian Bank Melmalayanoor branch Gingee taluk Villupuram District

¶37

2.M/s. Rains Seizures and Ware Housing Pvt Ltd P.Box No.16 39-B, Bye pass road, Chockalinga Nagar Madurai-625 010

¶38

3.The Chief General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Rajaji Road Chennai-1 R3-suo motu impleaded as per order dated19.09.2011 by NKKJ in W.P.No.24162 and 24163 of 2010

¶39

4.The Home Secretary of Tamilnadu Fort St.George, Chennai

¶40

5.The Director General of Police Chennai R4 and 5 suo motu impleaded as per order dated 19.08.2016 by NKKJ in W.P.s 24162,24163,28233 and 28234 of 201o in M.P.1 and 1 of 2010 ... Respondents

¶41

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to return the petitioner's land documents which given as a security purpose for tractor loaninS.Nos.7/4A,7/4B,7/4C,2/11,2/12,8/1,8/4A,7/5D,7/5B,7/5C,7/5G,7/6B ,7/6D,7/6E,7/6F,7/8G,7/6H at Sokkananthal and Kalatahmpatty village, Tindivanam to a total extent of acre 6-14 cents.

¶42

For Petitioner : Mr.A.E.Kalaiselvan

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶44

_________ Page 3 of 9_

¶45

W.P.No.24162 of 2010

¶46

For Respondents : Mr.M.Balachandar for R1

¶47

Mr.V.Ravi for R2

¶48

Mr.T.Poornam for R3

¶49

Mr.P.Sathish, AGP for R4 and 5

¶50

W.P.No.28233 of 2010

K.Ragu

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The General Manager Indian Overseas Bank Head Office Vellore, Vellore District 2.The Manager Indian Overseas Bank Branch Office Karaikudi branch Vellore Taluk and District 3.The Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Rajaji Road Chennai-1 R3-suo motu impleaded as per order dated 21.09.2011 by NKKJ in W.P.Nos.28233 and 28234 of 2010

¶55

4.The Home Secretary of Tamilnadu Fort St.George, Chennai 5.The Director General of Police Chennai R4 and 5 suo motu impleaded as per order dated 19.08.2016 by

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶57

Page 4 of 9

¶58

W.P.No.24162 of 2010

¶59

NKKJ in W.P.s 24162,24163,28233 and 28234 of 201o in M.P.1 and 1 of 2010

¶60

... Respondents

¶61

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of certiorari to call for the impugned notice dated 16/11/2010 on the file of the 2^nd respondent and any other subsequent proceedings and quash the same as illegal improper.

¶62

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Jayaprakash For Respondents : Mr.Vignesh Imayavaramban for R1 and 2 Mr.T.Poornam for R3 Mr.P.Sathish, AGP for R4 and 5

¶63

W.P.No.16951 of 2017

¶64

T.Chitra ... Petitioner Vs. The Branch Manager Indian Bank Melmalayanur branch Gingee Taluk Villupuram District ... Respondent

¶65

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondent to return the 48 gram gold jewels which is mortgaged to the respondent in JL.AC.No.6432512040 and pay compensation at 12% rate of interest from

¶66

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶67

Page 5 of 9

¶68

W.P.No.24162 of 2010

¶69

12.08.2016 till date for the amount Rs.30,600/- paid by the petitioner.

¶70

For Petitioner : Mr.A.E.Kalaiselvan

¶71

For Respondents : Mr.T.Sundarrajan

¶72

W.P.No.10503 of 2017

¶73

R.Baskar

¶74

... Petitioner

¶75

Vs. 1.The Chief General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Rajaji Salai Chennai-1 2.The Manager State Bank of India Desur Branch Vandavasi Taluk Thiruvannamalai District

¶76

3.The Reliance Commercial Finance Reliance Capital Ltd Reliance House 4^th floor No.5, Haddows road Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006 ... Respondents

¶77

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from harassing the petitioner and initiating the recovery proceedings of the Educational Loan Account No.30954176782(Loan Amount Rs.68000/-) against the petitioner till he get employment.

¶78

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶79

_________ Page 6 of 9_

¶80

W.P.No.24162 of 2010

¶81

For Petitioner : Mr.A.E.Kalaiselvan For Respondents : Mr.T.Poornam for R1

¶82

No Appearance for R2 and 3

¶83

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶84

The main grievance in all these Writ Petitions is with regard to the exercising the bankers lien. The recovery of money and the notice has been issued for recovery of money. This Court is of the view that the forum to agitate the same is not by way of filing these Writ Petitions. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected

¶85

miscellaneous petitions are closed.

01.12.2022

kpr

1.The Manager Indian Bank Melmalayanoor branch Gingee taluk Villupuram District

¶90

2.The Chief General Manager Reserve Bank of India Fort Glacis, Rajaji Road

¶91

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

Page 7 of 9

W.P.No.24162 of 2010

Chennai-1

3.The Home Secretary of Tamilnadu Fort St.George, Chennai

¶96

4.The Director General of Police Chennai

¶97

5.The General Manager Indian Overseas Bank Head Office Vellore, Vellore District

¶98

6.The Manager Indian Overseas Bank Branch Office Karaikudi branch Vellore Taluk and District

¶99

7.The Branch Manager Indian Bank Melmalayanur branch Gingee Taluk Villupuram District

¶100

8.The Manager State Bank of India Desur Branch Vandavasi Taluk Thiruvannamalai District

¶101

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶102

_________ Page 8 of 9_

¶103

W.P.No.24162 of 2010

¶104

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶105

kpr

¶106

W.P.Nos.24162,24163,28233 of 2010 and 10503 and 16591of 2017 & M.P.Nos.1,1 and 1 of 2010

¶107

01.12.2022

¶108

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶109

_________ Page 9 of 9_

C.Thiruvengadam, v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Thiruvengadam, v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Kumar @ Parkunan Vs Union Territory of Pondicherry

Sundaram Finance Limited Vs Bhola Singh

P. Gopal Reddy Vs the District Collector

Mr. G. Shankar Vs The Deputy Director/Principal

Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

C.Subramani Vs the General Manager