Dismissed

Sky Line Network v. the Manging Director

Madras HC17 Nov 2022WP/2263/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus for a cable TV network license. The court found the petition infructuous as the respondents had already considered the petitioner's representation and granted the license. The petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Relief was a writ of mandamus; it was not granted as the petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the license already being granted.

Sky Line Network Vs the Manging Director — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.2263 of 2008

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 17.11.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶6

W.P.No.2263 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008

¶7

Sky Line Network, New No.14.A, I Floor, Seniamman Koil Vth Lane, Tondiarpet, Chennai 600 081. Rep. by its Prop: R.Neelagandan

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai 600 005.

¶11

2.The Executive Engineer, Circle I, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.

¶12

3.The Inspector of Police (L&O), H.5, New Washermenpet Police Station, New Washermenpet, Chennai 600 021.

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

1/4

¶16

W.P.No.2263 of 2008

¶17

Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider petitioner representation dated 24.12.2006 and grant license to the petitioner firm to run Cable T.V. Network situated at Hindustan Lever Limited Nagar, Tondiarpet, Chennai 600 081.

¶18

For Petitioner : M/s.Praveena for Dr.G.Krishnamoorthy For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Standing Counsel for Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

This writ petition is filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider petitioner representation dated 24.12.2006 and grant license to the petitioner firm to run Cable T.V. Network situated at Hindustan Lever Limited Nagar, Tondiarpet, Chennai 600 081.

¶21

The learned counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2 states that the

¶22

representation of the petitioner was considered favourably in favour of the petitioner and license has been granted to the petitioner to run Cable T.V. Network in the said place. Since request had already been considered by the respondents, this Court is of the view that the prayer in the writ petition has

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶24

W.P.No.2263 of 2008

¶25

become infructuous.

¶26

Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No

¶27

costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

17.11.2022

cda

1.R.Neelagandan, Proprietor, Sky Line Network, New No.14.A, I Floor, Seniamman Koil Vth Lane, Tondiarpet, Chennai 600 081.

¶32

2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai 600 005.

¶33

3.The Executive Engineer, Circle I, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010.

¶34

4.The Inspector of Police (L&O), H.5, New Washermenpet Police Station, New Washermenpet, Chennai 600 021.

¶35

S.S.SUNDAR. J.,

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/4

W.P.No.2263 of 2008

cda

W.P.No.2263 of 2008

17.11.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

Sky Line Network v. the Manging Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sky Line Network v. the Manging Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Ayubkhan, Vs The District Collector

S.Sivaraj Vs the Asst. Registrar

Mrs.T.Meerabai Vs The Assistant Director

Sri Ganapathy Engineering Works Vs The Superintending Engineer/Civil

R.Sathish Vs The Regional Manager/

P.Senthil Kumar, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu