Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order and restoration of an appeal. Court found relief sought infructuous as nothing survived for adjudication and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 11.03.2022
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.MAHADEVAN and
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
W.P.No.22219 of 2006
M/s.Moorthy Auto Spares, Rep. by its Partner, T.P.Nallamuthu, 1309, Mettur Road, Erode.
...Petitioner Versus
Tamil Nadu Sales Tax
Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Coimbatore – 18.
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records on the files of the first respondent in C.T.M.P.No.29/05 in C.T.A.No.529/95 dated 10.08.2005 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to restore the main appeal No.529/95 and then decide on merits.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was delivered by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought by the petitioner has become infructuous and therefore, nothing survives in this petition for further adjudication.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrr
To
W.P.No.22219 of 2006
PMK(CO) SU(04/04/2022)
M/s.Moorthy Auto Spares
The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Coimbatore
The Commercial Tax Officer, Mettru Road, Circle, Erode
R.MAHADEVAN
J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
