K.S.Mohammed Hussain v. Managing Director
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court observed that after the property tax assessment was made and accepted by the petitioners, the water and sewerage tax demands were revised accordingly. Consequently, the petitioners' grievance no longer survives, and the writ petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
None; the writ petition was closed as the tax demands were revised by the respondents based on the accepted property tax assessment.
What the court decided
W.P.No.21721 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 29.09.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P.No.21721 of 2014
and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014
- K.S.Mohammed Hussain
- Hasan Faiz Ahmed
- Tmt.Aysath Mafeetha
- Md.Abdul Khader
- Hasoon Muzammal
- Tmt.Aysath Shamila
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the water and sewerage tax demands should be revised based on the reassessed property tax order accepted by the petitioners.
Whether the grievance regarding water and sewerage tax demands survives after the revision based on the property tax assessment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.S.Mohammed Hussain and others
- respondent
Managing Director, Chennai Metro Water Supply and Sewerage Board
- respondent
Depot Engineer
- respondent
Division Engineer – 5
- respondent
The Corporation of Chennai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court