Dismissed
V.Varadharajan, v. Union of India
Madras HCWP/21642/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition under Article 226 as infructuous after learned counsel admitted the prayer for sitting out a notification had no surviving legal effect.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED : 05.01.2022
¶3
CORAM:
¶4
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
¶5
W.P.No.21642 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.25389 to 25391 of 2018
¶6
V.Varadharajan
¶7
...Petitioner
¶8
Vs
¶9
- Union of India Rep by its Chief Secretary Govt. of Puducherry Gobert Avenue Puducherry.
¶10
- The Co-ordinator Centralised Admissions Committee (CENTAC) Pondicherry Engineering College Kalapet Puducherry.
¶11
- The Medical Council of India, Rep by its Secretary, Pocket-14, sector-8, Dwarka, New Delhi-77.
¶12
- Director Indira Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute, Kathirgamam, Puducherry. ...Respondents
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
V.Varadharajan
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Centralised Admissions Committee (CENTAC)
- respondent
Medical Council of India
- respondent
Director Indira Gandhi Medical College & Research Institute
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court