A.Jayasekar v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge granted the petitioner fifteen days extension to file an affidavit of undertaking for depositing a proportionate amount attached under the TANPID Act, maintaining earlier directions for distribution and compounding.
What did the court decide?
Fifteen days extension granted to file affidavit of undertaking and deposit proportionate amount before TANPID court.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.21295 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
N.SATHISH KUMAR.J.,
This writ petition was disposed of by this court by order dated 14.10.2022 with the following directions:-
- In such a view of the matter, petitioner is directed to file an affidavit of undertaking before the competent authority, within a period of fifteen days, from today. Thereafter, the competent authority/fourth respondent shall take steps to distribute the amount with the sanction of the Court and also make steps to compound the offence, as per Section 5 A of the said Act.
- In the event, if the writ petitioner has failed to pay the amount, as agreed before the competent authority, by way of an affidavit, it is well open to the competent authority to proceed further, as per law. If the amount is deposited and the entire amount is realised and distributed, then the writ petitioner may seek for raising the attachment before the appropriate Court by filing an appropriate application. The said exercise shall be completed, within a period of two months, from the date of filing of the application.
- It is again listed today before the court under the caption "For Being Mentioned" at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner to consider the request for the grant of extension of time to deposit the amount as directed earlier.
- According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner could
1 of 2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an extension of time of fifteen days can be granted to the petitioner to file an affidavit of undertaking regarding the deposit of a proportionate amount attached under the TANPID Act.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner (Subsequent Purchaser)
- respondent
Competent Authority/Decort Respondent
Coram
J.N.Sathish Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court