Two writ petitions challenging patta grants were dismissed as infructuous upon the petitioners admitting there was nothing left to adjudicate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.09.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 in W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013
Krishnasamy @ Kistappa Naicker ... Petitioner in W.P.No.18648 of 2013
V.Malaisamy ... Petitioner in W.P.No.18649 of 2013
Vs.
Page No.1 of 7
W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013
12.K.Santhanakrishnan … Respondents in both W.Ps
PRAYER in W.P.No.18648 of 2013: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to act upon and pass orders on the petition dated 26.06.2013 submitted by the petitioner under Section 7(A) and 7(C) of the Tamil Nadu Estate (Abolition & Conversion Into Ryotwari) Act, 1948
Page No.2 of 7
W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013
challenging the order dated 21.10.2011 based on which the patta has been granted in favour of the 11th respondent within a time to be stipulated by this Court.
PRAYER in W.P.No.18649 of 2013: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to act upon and pass orders on the petition dated 19.06.2013 submitted by the petitioner under Section 7(A) and 7(C) of the Tamil Nadu Estate (Abolition & Conversion Into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 challenging the order dated 16.05.2011 based on which the patta has been granted in favour of the 11th respondent within a time to be stipulated by this Court.
| For Petitioner in both W.Ps |
: Mr.Sundara Kameshmarthandan |
|---|---|
| For Respondents 1 to 10 | : Mr.U.Bharanidharan, |
| in both W.Ps | Additional Government Pleader |
| For Respondent 11 in both W.Ps |
: Mr.M.Rajendran |
| For Respondent 12 in both W.Ps |
: M/s.S.Radha Gopalan |
C O M M O N O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the
Page No.3 of 7
W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013
petitioners submitted that the matters have become infructuous and nothing
survives in these writ petitions for further adjudication. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition today.
29.09.2022
vm Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No
Copy To:
Page No.4 of 7
W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013
Page No.5 of 7
W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013
M.DHANDAPANI,J.
vm
W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013
Page No.6 of 7
W.P.Nos.18648 & 18649 of 2013
29.09.2022
Page No.7 of 7
Krishnasamy @ Kistappa Naicker
V. Malaisamy
The Special Commissioner and Commissioner Of Land Administration
V. Kamalakannan
K. Santhanakrishnan
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
