Dismissed

S.Madeswaran, v. the Thasildhar

Madras HC27 Apr 2022WP/18099/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought quashing of an order relating to alleged encroachment and directed grant of patta for government land. The court found the petition infructuous as the District Collector had issued an order nullifying the basis of the earlier proceedings, leaving nothing for adjudication.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

S.Madeswaran, Vs the Thasildhar — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.18099 of 2010

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 27.04.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

W.P.No.18099 of 2010 and MP.NO.2 of 2010

S.Madeswaran

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Tahsildar, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: This Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus Calling for the records relating to the impugned order dt.18.7.2010 made in Na.K.12063/2010(A4) issued by the respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to grant patta in the name of the petitioner to the Sarkar Poramboke land measuring an extent of 0.0179.0 sq. metre comprised in TSLR 59, Ward A, Block 8 of Seetharampalayam, Thiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manoharan

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.V.Veluchamy Additional Government Pleader

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

1/4

W.P.No.18099 of 2010

Order

This petition has been filed for issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order dt.18.7.2010 issued by the respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to grant patta in the name of the petitioner to the Sarkar Poramboke land measuring an extent of 0.0179.0 sq. metre comprised in TSLR 59, Ward A, Block 8 of Seetharampalayam, Thiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District.

¶19

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner as if he encroached the Government poromboke land. However subsequently the District Collector has passed an order dated 17.05.2011 and in view of the said subsequent order, nothing remains for further adjudication in this Writ Petition.

¶20

In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶21

27.04.2022

¶22

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2/4

W.P.No.18099 of 2010

1.The Special Tahsildar (L.A) Adi Dravidar Welfare, Chengam, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶28

2.The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

3/4

W.P.No.18099 of 2010

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

W.P.No.18099 of 2010

¶35

27.04.2022

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

4/4

S.Madeswaran, v. the Thasildhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Madeswaran, v. the Thasildhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohaideen Pitchi Vappa Trust, Vs the Sub Registrar

M.Krishnan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Gopinathan Vs The District Collector

Arulmigu Veeramathi Temple Vs the District Collector

D.Ramachandran, Vs The Inspector General of

T.Hariharan Vs the district collector