Disposed

T.Paneerselvam v. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Tamil nadu

Madras HC7 Feb 2022WP/1751/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking a direction to provide bus service to villagers. The court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, conduct a survey on viability, and operate the service if found viable.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioner's representation, conduct a survey, and operate bus service if found viable.

T.Paneerselvam Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 07.2.2022

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY

W.P.No.1751 of 2022

T.Paneerselvam

.. Petitioner

1.The Additional Chief Secretary

¶11

to Government of Tamil Nadu, Transport Department/ Chairman/Managing Director, TNTDFC Ltd., Fort.St.George,

¶12

Chennai-9.

¶13

2.The District Collector, Villupuram District.

¶14

3.The Manager, Villupuram Transport Division, Varadhareddy, Villupuram District. .. Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to provide bus service facility to the villagers in Sorappur Village, Veeranam Post, Villupuram District.

¶16

For Petitioner : Ms.R.Poornima

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar, State Government Pleader for R1 & R2

¶18

ORDER

¶19

(Order of the Court was made by

¶20

the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice)

¶21

We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to provide bus service facility to the villagers in Sorappur Village, Veeranam Post, Villupuram District.

¶24

The learned State Government Pleader appearing for

¶25

respondents 1 and 2 submits that due to non availability of sufficient passengers, the bus service was withdrawn, as the villagers prefer to travel by share auto for short distance and finding that the bus service might not be viable, it was withdrawn. It is further submitted that if a direction is given to consider the representation, they will make proper survey and if the bus service is found viable, an appropriate decision would be taken.

¶26

Taking into consideration the said submissions of the

¶27

learned State Government Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 02.11.2021 and after conducting a survey, if the bus service is found viable, the same may be operated. There will be no order as to costs.

¶28

Sd/-

¶29

Assistant Registrar(CS-V)

¶30

//True Copy//

¶31

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶32

¶33

To:

¶34

1.The Additional Chief Secretary

¶35

to Government of Tamil Nadu,

¶36

Transport Department/

¶37

Chairman/Managing Director, TNTDFC Ltd., Fort.St.George,

¶38

Chennai-9.

¶39

2.The District Collector, Villupuram District.

¶40

3.The Manager, Villupuram Transport Division, Varadhareddy, Villupuram District.

¶41

+1cc to Ms.R.Poornima, Advocate, S.R.No.7630

¶42

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.7743

W.P.No.1751 of 2022

SRA(CO)

SB(10/02/2022)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Paneerselvam v. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Tamil nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Paneerselvam v. The Additional Chief Secretary to Government of Tamil nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D. Naresh Kumar Vs the Deputy Director

J.Mohamed Anasu Vs Tamil Nadu State Election Commission

Prakash Subramaniam Vs The Government of Tamilnadu