A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed to stop eviction from a quarry site, was dismissed as withdrawn at the instance of the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.16376 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P.No.16376 of 2018
and
WMP.No.19538 of 2018
Vs
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from evicting the petitioners or from in any way interfering with his possession and his other lawful activities in his quarry site viz. 56.65 Hecs in S.No.483/1, Chinna Goundanur Village, Sankari Taluk, Salem District.
For Petitioner : Mr. P. Jagadeesan
For Respondents : Mr. S.Ravikumar, Spl.G.P., for R1 : Mr. K.M.D. Muhilan, Government Advocate, for R2
W.P.No.16376 of 2018
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court
to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
05.04.2022
Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order : yes/no
mrp
To
W.P.No.16376 of 2018
Salem Division, Salem 636 007.
W.P.No.16376 of 2018
V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.,
mrp
W.P.No.16376 of 2018
05.04.2022
S. Jayakumar
Malliga
Muthukumar
Ganapathy Subramaniam
The District Forest Officer, Salem Division
The District Collector, Salem District
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
