S.Venkatesan v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition for implementation of a G.O.Ms. regarding a toilet maintenance was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear before the court.
What the court decided
W.P.No.316305 of 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
W.P.No.16305 of 2004
Venkatesan
...Petitioner
Vs.
The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai ... Respondent
PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of mandamus directing the respondent to implement and enforce the G.O.Ms.No.105 dated 05.05.1999 in respect of the toilet in Norton Salai, division No.148, Zone-X for the maintenance of the toilet.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Venkatesan
- respondent
The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai
Coram
N. SATHISH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court