Disposed

M/S.Tempel Precision Metal v. the Competent Authority and

Madras HC22 Apr 2022WP/16282/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an impugned order regarding the conferment of permanent status to workmen. The court noted that the parties amicably resolved the dispute via a Memorandum of Settlement under the Industrial Disputes Act and Rules. Consequently, the writ petition was closed without further effective orders.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition closed. No costs.

M/S.Tempel Precision Metal Vs the Competent… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 22.04.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶5

W.P.No.16282 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013

¶6

M/s. Tempel Precision Metal Products India Private Limited, D-6/IV, Phase II, Zone B, Madras Export Processing Zone, Tambaram, Chennai – 600045.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Competent Authority and Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories (Authority under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments) (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981), Circle – IV, Chennai – 600006.

¶10

Chennai Yetrumathi Valaga Uzhiyargal Matrum Podhu Thohilalar Sangam, Rep. by its General Secretary, 15, Kannan Street, Kadapperi, Tambaram, Chennai – 600045.

¶11

... Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records leading to the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Application No.A/2098/2011-I dated 09.04.2012 and quash the same.

¶13

For Petitioner : Ms.M.Vijaya

¶14

For Respondents: M/s.Row & Reddy [R2]

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Pending the Writ Petition, both the petitioner/Management and the workmen have amicably resolved the dispute among themselves and accordingly, have entered into a Memorandum of Settlement under Section 12(3) and Rule 25(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act & Rules, 1947 dated 24.12.2013.

¶18

In view of the amicable settlement, no effective orders can be passed in the present Writ Petition. Hence, the Writ Petition stands closed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Assistant Registrar(CS II)

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

Sni

¶24

¶25

The Competent Authority and Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories (Authority under the Tamil Nadu

¶26

Industrial Establishments)

¶27

(Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981), Circle – IV,

¶28

Chennai – 600006.

¶29

The General Secretary,

¶30

Chennai Yetrumathi Valaga Uzhiyargal Matrum Podhu Thohilalar Sangam, 15, Kannan Street, Kadapperi,

¶31

Tambaram, Chennai – 600045.

W.P.No.16282 of 2013

EV[co]

NSK 11/05/2022

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Tempel Precision Metal v. the Competent Authority and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Tempel Precision Metal v. the Competent Authority and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sangili Vs The Inspector of Police

A.Megrunniza, Vs The Director

B.Balakrishnan Vs The Director of Local Fund

A.Alamelu Vs Puducherry Corporation for

M.Ramakrishnan, Vs the Chairman-Cum-Managing

K.S.Chakaravarthy, Vs the State of Tamil Nadu