The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of an appellate tribunal's judgment. The court held that the prayer had become infructuous and dismissed the petition with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 08.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
W.P.No.16210 of 2011
N.Subramaniam .. Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of a writ, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent- The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Puducherry's Judgement and decree made in M.V.Appeal No.13 of 2007 dated 18.01.2011 by dismissing the petitioner's Appeal and to quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Hariharan For Respondents : No Appearance
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer in this writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, this Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
jai
To
W.P.No.16210 of 2011
GP(CO) CT 15/06/2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Subramaniam
The Secretary, State Transport Authority, Puducherry
The State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Puducherry
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
