The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous upon reliance by counsel on an endorsement made by the petitioner. The petition sought to declare SSLC examination results via Certiorari and Mandamus.
No relief granted; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 30.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.15495 of 2010 & M.P.No.1 of 2010
S.Murugasamy ...Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer :- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.032624/E5/08, dated 18.12.2009 and quash the same and direct the respondents to declare the results of the SSLC examination written by the petitioner in September 2008 under Register No.657233.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajendran
For Respondents : Mr.Neethi Perumal Government Advocate
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
r n s To
S. Murugasamy
The Director of Government Examinations, College Road, Chennai - 600 006
The Regional Deputy director of Government Examinations, Coimbatore - 641 001
K. KALYANASUNDARAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
