The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a writ petition seeking review of a maximum age limit for Lab Technician appointments upon receipt of an uncontested request to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
W.P.No.15166 of 2015
and M.P.No.1 of 2015
1.C.Kamalakannan 2.C.Gunasekaran 3.R.Raja 4.P.Arulmani 5.C.Dhanam 6.M.Kirubha 7.N.Raja 8.V.Sentamilselvi 9.F.Nafiya Begum 10.B.Sangeetha 11.P.Subramani 12.J.Parasakthi 13.K.Malarvizhi 14.B.Manivannan 15.R.Sasikaladevi 16.P.Indira ...Petitioners -Vs1. State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Govt., Health & Family Welfare (C2) Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9. 2. The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai – 10. 3. The Director of Public Health & Preventive Medicines, Chennai - 6. 4. The Medical Services Recruitment Board, Rep. by the Member Secretary, DMS Building, Annasalai, Teynampet, Chennai - 6. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioners also for appointment to the post of Lab Technician Grade III and appoint them in the vacancies notified by the 4th respondent dated Nil, if they are otherwise eligible without rejecting their claim on the basis of the maximum age limit as the prescription of the maximum age limit is unconstitutional and ultravires.
For Petitioners: Mr.R.Sakthivel (E.No.1364/2020)
for Ms.R.Suchitra
For R1 to R3 : Mr.C.Selvaraj, Additional Government Pleader
For R4 : Mr.M.Loganathan
ORDER
Today, when the matter was called, Mr.R.Sakthivel, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.Recording the submission and the endorsement made, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
hvk
To
Chennai - 9.
BS(CO) RGA(26/04/2022)
C. Kamalakannan and others
State of Tamilnadu and others
M.S.Ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
