M.Sivamalai v. S.Palaniamy
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :…
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
W.P.NO.14606 OF 2003 AND W.M.P.NO.18246 OF 2003
M.Sivamalai
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.S.Palanisamy
2.The Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Namakkal (Post), Salem District. ...Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of writ directing the 2nd respondent herein to convene the timing conference after restoring the original schedule of timings that was in effect before 10.04.1994 and to notify the same in the Timing Conference Notice as existing timings.
The Writ petitioner has come up with this writ petition, seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent, to convene the Timing Conference for restoration of original schedule of timing that was in effect before 10.04.1994. It is not known whether the petitioner is interested in pressing the prayer at this distant point of time. This Court is not inclined to issue any direction to the 2nd respondent, to restore the schedule of timing that was in force before 10.04.1994, at this point of time (28 years). Hence, the writ petition is dismissed with an liberty to the petitioner to approach the 2nd respondent for reschedule of
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Sivamalai
- respondent
The Secretary Regional Transport Authority, Namakkal
Coram
S.S.Outhar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court