Dismissed

M/s. Arr Chenani Gateway v. The Government of TamilNadu

Madras HC3 Jan 2022WP/14446/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging property tax notices issued by the Greater Chennai Corporation and Chennai Metropolitan Water and Sewerage Board. The Petitioner sought to withdraw the petition during hearings; the Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the W.P. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions closed.

M/s. Arr Chenani Gateway Vs The Government of TamilNadu — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 03.01.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P.No.14446 of 2020 and W.M.P.Nos.17936 & 17939 of 2020

¶6

(Through Video Conferencing)

¶7

M/s.ARR Chennai Gateway, Represented by its Proprietor, Thiru.A.B.Raghupathy, No.23A, Jawarharlal Nehru Road, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 107. ... Petitioner

¶8

The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Revenue and Administration, St. George Fort, Chennai - 600 009.

¶9

The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Represented by the Assistant Revenue Officer, Chennai - 600 003.

¶10

The Chennai Metropolitan Water and Sewerage Board, Represented by Assisted Engineer-Division :10, Chennai. ...Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records on the file of the second and third respondents in GCC Property Tax-Notice No.10 dated 27.06.2019 and consequent proceedings of the third respondent vide Letter No.CMWSSB/AREA X/DAE-29/TAX/SPL/2019 dated 10.09.2019 quash the same.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Kirubanandam For Respondents : For R1 : Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate For R2 : Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi Standing Counsel For R3 : Mr.P.K.Panneer Selvam Standing Counsel

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶16

Sd/-

¶17

Assistant Registrar(CS VII)

¶18

//True Copy//

¶19

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

arb

¶21

¶22

The Revenue and Administration, The Government of Tamil Nadu,

¶23

St. George Fort, Chennai - 600 009.

¶24

The Commissioner, The Assistant Revenue Officer, Greater Chennai Corporation, Chennai - 600 003.

¶25

The Assisted Engineer-Division The Chennai Metropolitan Water and Sewerage Board, 10, Chennai.

¶26

+1cc to Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi, Advocate, S.R.No.305

¶27

W.P.No.14446 of 2020 and W.M.P.Nos.17936 & 17939 of 2020

¶28

NMI[co] NSK 20/01/2022

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s. Arr Chenani Gateway v. The Government of TamilNadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Arr Chenani Gateway v. The Government of TamilNadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arval India Private Limited Vs State of Tamil Nadu

healthcubed India Private Limited Vs The Deputy commissioner (St)

M/s.Sekar Constructions, Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)

M/s.Sambros Tex Global Ltd. Vs The Commissioner of customs (Exports)

M/s. Clean Swicth India Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Tax Officer

M/s.Sua Explosives and Accessories Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Assistant Commissioner(St)