Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of a circular. Court found the prayer infructuous on submission and dismissed the petition without costs.
Petition dismissed as infructuous without order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 10.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Saveetha University (Declared U/s.3 of the UGC Act 1956) Represented by its Registrar, No.162, Poonamalle High Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai-600 077.
... Petitioner
Medical Council of India, Represented by its Secretary, Pocket-14, Sector-8, Dwarka Phase-1, New Delhi-110 077.
... Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent in the circular dated 16.01.2015 in reference No.MCI-34(MC)/2014/149869 and quash the same.
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner made a submission that the prayer in this writ petition has become infructuous.
infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
psa
To
The Secretary, Medical Council of India, Pocket-14, Sector-8, Dwarka Phase-1, New Delhi-110 077.
+1cc to M/s.S.Saravanan, Advocate, S.R.No.33843
W.P.No.13984 of 2015
MT(CO) RLP(30/06/2022)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking writ of certiorari is maintainable given the submission that the prayer has become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Saveetha University
Medical Council of India
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
