Dr.Dinesh M.S. v. The Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus to prevent contract labour employment was withdrawn by the petitioner, resulting in the dismissal of the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
W.P.No.29971 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.10.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.29971 of 2018 and
W.M.P.No.34973 of 2018
Doosan Employees Union Rep.by its General Secretary, Regn.No.512/TVR No.42, Anjaneyar Koil Street, Poonamallee
Chennai – 600 056. ...Petitioner Vs.
- 1.Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Secretary, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.
- 2.The Joint Director, Industrial Safety and Health Department, No.9 & 10, Lal Bagadhur Sastri Street, Periakuppam, Tiruvallur – 602 001.
- 3.The Inspector of Factories, Industrial Safety and Health Department, No.9 & 10, Lal Bagadhur Sastri Street, Periakuppam, Tiruvallur – 602 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Doosan Employees Union
- respondent
Government of Tamil Nadu
- respondent
Joint Director, Industrial Safety and Health Department
- respondent
Inspector of Factories
- respondent
Management, Doosan Power Systems India Private Limited
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court