Dismissed

Mrs.N.Mrinalini Reddy, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Madras HC28 Jul 2022WP/1296/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking mandamus for disbursement of retirement and pension benefits dismissed. The court noted that claims were settled, leaving the petitioner liberty to approach authorities for ongoing monthly pension.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stood closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach authorities for redressal regarding monthly pension.

Mrs.N.Mrinalini Reddy, Vs The Regional… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 22.09.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶6

S.Ganesan ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007.

¶9

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue

¶10

a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2017 to disburse the retirement benefits and pension benefits to the petitioner.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.R.Babu

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This petition has been filed to directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2017 to disburse the retirement benefits and pension benefits to the petitioner.

¶17

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents made a submission that the terminal and pensionary benefits due to the writ petitioner have already been settled. If at all, the monthly pension is yet to be paid, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the authorities for redressal of this grievance. With this liberty, this writ petition stands closed. No Costs.

¶18

22.09.2022

¶19

Index : Yes Internet : Yes Speaking order/Non-Speaking order ssr To

¶20

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007.

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶24

The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem), No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem – 636 007.

¶25

3/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶28

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

¶29

ssr

¶30

W.P.No.31828 of 2017

¶31

22.09.2022

¶32

4/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mrs.N.Mrinalini Reddy, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.N.Mrinalini Reddy, v. The Regional Transport Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.a.Ganesan Vs Assistant Director of

T.Thyagarajan, Vs The Home Secretary

Mr.a.Shivakumar, Vs The State Transport

M/s.Styleman Textile Pvt. Ltd. Vs Micro & Small Enterprises

M. Madhesh Vs Sub Registrar (Co-operrative)

K.Chinnasamy, Vs The Deputy Registrar of