Dismissed

Mrs.v.Kalaivani, v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation

Madras HC10 Oct 2022WP/12891/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking an order to call for records regarding LPG distributorship selection, the petitioner filed via W.P.No.12891 of 2012 and was represented by no appearance. The court dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous due to non-appearance.

Mrs.v.Kalaivani, Vs Bharat Petroleum… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.12891 of 2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10.10.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.12891 of 2012

¶7

& M.P.No.2 of 2012

V.Kalalivani

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd rep by Territory Manager (LPG) 11-J6, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, New Gummidipoondi Tamilnadu-601201

¶12

2.Sankarasundari Jagathesan

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for records relating to the brochure on selection of Bharatgas Distributors issued in March 2010 containing the parameters for LPG distributorship and consequently the advertisement dated 15.06.2010 issued in Newspaper which has culminated in issuance of the reply letter issued to the petitioner in CHN:LPG:WEST TAMBARAM dated 31.12.2011, quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner to grant the LPG Distributorship at Pallikaranai, Kanchipuram District.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶16

_________ Page 1 of 4_

¶17

W.P.No.12891 of 2012

¶18

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.O.S.Karthikeyan for R1 Mr.S.Sathishrajan for R2 O R D E R

¶19

Writ petition is filed seeking a direction to call for the records relating

¶20

to the brochure on selection of Bharatgas Distributors issued in March 2010 containing the parameters for LPG distributorship and consequently the advertisement dated 15.06.2010 issued in Newspaper which has culminated in issuance of the reply letter issued to the petitioner in CHN:LPG:WEST TAMBARAM dated 31.12.2011, quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner to grant the LPG Distributorship at Pallikaranai, Kanchipuram District.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶22

10.10.2022.

¶23

kpr Internet:Yes Speaking/Non speaking order

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

Page 2 of 4

W.P.No.12891 of 2012

The Territory Manager (LPG) Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd 11-J6, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, New Gummidipoondi Tamilnadu-601201

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶30

_________ Page 3 of 4_

¶31

W.P.No.12891 of 2012

¶32

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J. kpr

¶33

W.P.No.12891 of 2012 & M.P.No.2 of 2012

¶34

10.10.2022

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶36

_________ Page 4 of 4_

Mrs.v.Kalaivani, v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.v.Kalaivani, v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Raghupathy Vs the Secretary to Government

Keeranur Watershed Vs the National Wasteland

Maattuvelanpatti Watershed Vs the National Wasteland

Mrs.Asha Benziger, Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation

M/S.v.G. Paper and Board Ltd. Vs the Govt. of Tamilnadu

R. Devadass Vs the Commissioner of Police