Disposed

Kancheepuram District v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC15 Feb 2022WP/12228/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus to quash government orders regarding school regulations and direct recognition of petitioner schools. The court held the petition infructuous as the government addressed the grievance via a subsequent G.O., advising the petitioner to approach authorities based on the new order.

What the court decided

AI extract

Kancheepuram District Vs the State of Tamil Nadu — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 15.02.2022

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ

¶5

Writ Petition No.12228 of 2014 & W.M.P.Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of 2014

¶6

Kancheepuram District, Self Financing Schools Association, 141 , Radha Nagar Main Road, Chrompet, Chennai-600 044 Rep. By Its President, S.Prince Babu Rajendran.

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

-Vs-

¶9

The State Of Tamil Nadu, Represented By Its Secretary,

¶10

School Education Department, Secretariat Chennai-600 009.

¶11

The Director Of Matriculation Schools, State Of Tamil Nadu, College Road, DPI Campus Chennai-600 006.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order issued by the 1st Respondent in G.O.(2D) No.48, School Education Department, dated 21/07/2004 and the subsequent amendment issued in G.O.(2D) No.24, School Education Department dated 23/04/2010 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents to grant permanent recognition to the Petitioner Schools established and recognized prior to 21/07/2004 under the provisions of Code of Regulation of Matriculation Schools in Tamil Nadu, within a time frame to be fixed by this Honourable Court.

¶14

For Petitioner : M/S.G.Sankaran

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

For Respondents: M/S.Raja Rajeswari (Government Advocate School Education)

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

The petitioner have preferred the writ petition challenging the G.O.(2D)No.24 School Education Department dated 23/04/2010.

¶19

The writ petition was filed in the year 2014 subsequent to the filing of the writ petition, the Government considered the issues raised by the petitioners and issued G.O.Ms.No. 175 School Education Department dated 20-07-2017 in which the grievance raised by the petitioner has been addressed. Therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. If at all the petitioner association still has grievance, they can make further representation on the basis of G.O.Ms.No.175 dated 20.07.2017.

¶20

With this observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CS-III)

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

sha/kpr

¶26

¶27

The Secretary State Of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Secretariat Chennai-600 009. 2. The Director Of Matriculation Schools, State Of Tamil Nadu, College Road, DPI Campus Chennai-600 006. +1cc to M/s.G.Sankaran, Advocate, S.R.No.9984

¶28

W.P.No.12228 of 2014 W.M.P.Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of 2014 PMK(CO) SU(04/03/2022)

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kancheepuram District v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Kancheepuram District v. the State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Chithirakumar, Vs the Managing Director

R.Alagan, Vs the Managing Director

A. Ameena Be Vs the Managing Director

S.Ramasamy Vs the State of Tamilnadu

T.v.Hari Prasad Vs The Directorate of Medical

S.Sivapatham Vs The Assistant Executive