Disposed

S.Rajarethinam, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC12 Dec 2022WP/12107/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, in three connected writ petitions filed by petitioners seeking promotion as Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes for the panel year 2015, held the prayer to be infructuous and consequently closed these writ petitions without awarding costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs, as the prayer was deemed infructuous.

S.Rajarethinam, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.Nos.12107, 12108 & 12109 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.12.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶6

W.P.Nos.12107, 12108 & 12109 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.10477, 10478 & 10479 of 2016

¶7

S. Rajarethinam ... Petitioner in WP.No.12107/2016 A. Kalaiselvan ... Petitioner in WP.No.12108/2016 S. Bhuvaneswaran ... Petitioner in WP.No.12109/2016 Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Principal Secretary to Government, CT and Registration Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶8

2.The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 006. ... Respondents in all WPs

¶9

Common Prayer : Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to promote the petitioners as Deputy Commissioner of

¶10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/4

¶11

W.P.Nos.12107, 12108 & 12109 of 2016

¶12

Commercial Taxes for the panel year 2015 consequent to inclusion of their name vide G.O.Ms.No.40 CT and Registration(E2) Department dated 10.03.2015 with retrospective effect from the said date with all attendant and consequential benefits without reference to the subsequent charge memos dated 18.02.2016 (received on 14.03.2016), 16.03.2015 (received on 21.05.2015) and 03.08.2015 respectively.

¶13

For Petitioners : Mr.V. Vijay Shankar (in all WPs) For Respondents : Mr.T. Chezhiyan, (in all WPs) Additional Government Pleader [R1] Mr.T.N.C. Kaushik, Additional Government Pleader (T) [R2]

¶14

COMMON ORDER

¶15

Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners

¶16

that the prayer sought for in the present Writ Petitions has become infructuous, these Writ Petitions stand closed. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶17

12.12.2022

¶18

Speaking/Non-speaking order Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/4

¶20

2/4

¶21

W.P.Nos.12107, 12108 & 12109 of 2016

¶22

Sni

¶23

¶24

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, CT and Registration Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶25

2.The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk,

¶26

Chennai – 600 006.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/4

¶28

W.P.Nos.12107, 12108 & 12109 of 2016

¶29

M.S.RAMESH,J.

¶30

Sni

¶31

W.P.Nos.12107, 12108 & 12109 of 2016

¶32

12.12.2022

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4/4

S.Rajarethinam, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Rajarethinam, v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Venkatesan Vs The Chairman

T.Pavithra Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

K.Palani Karthikeyan Vs Deputy Commissioner of Police

R.Rajendran, Vs Government of Tamil Nadu

V.Ramachandran, Vs The State of Tamilnadu rep. by

S.Sivakumar Vs The Secretary to Government