Dismissed

Salem Mandala Anaithu Paniyalargal v. The Secretary to Government

Madras HC8 Feb 2022WP/11752/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging an order refusing to refer an industrial dispute for adjudication. The Court held the petition infructuous after the petitioner produced evidence of a subsequent Government Order referring the dispute in January 2021.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Salem Mandala Anaithu Paniyalargal Vs The Secretary to… — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.02.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶5

W.P.NO.11752 OF 2019

¶6

Salem Mandala Anaithu Paniyalargal Sangam, (Registration No. 944/SLM) Rep. by its General Secretary, Having registered office at No.44A, Mariamman Koil Street, Hasthampatti, Salem -07.

¶7

...Petitioner

¶8

-vs-

¶9

The Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department, Fort St. George,

¶10

Chennai – 600 009.

¶11

The Management, S1239, Aayipalayam Primary Agricultural Co-op. Credit Society Limited, Athanur (Post),

¶12

Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District,

¶13

Pin – 636 301.

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the First Respondent pertaining to G.O.(D) No. 03 dated 04.01.2017 and quash the same and further direct the First Respondent to refer the dispute raised by the Petitioner Union for adjudication by an appropriate forum created under the provisions of the I.D. Act 1947.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.K.V.Shanmuganathan For R1 : Mr.P.Gurunathan Additional Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order refusing to refer the dispute raised by the Petitioner/Union for industrial adjudication.

¶20

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has brought to notice that after the filing of the Writ Petition, the Government of Tamil Nadu by G.O. Ms. No. 14, Labour and Employment (D1) Department dated 18.01.2021, referred the dispute for industrial adjudication and a copy of the said Governmental Order has been produced. He has filed a memo dated 08.02.2022 to that effect through e-mail, which is placed on record. In view of the same, nothing remains for further consideration in this Writ Petition.

¶21

In fine, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS-V)

¶24

//True Copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

¶27

¶28

The Secretary to Government, Labour and Employment Department,

¶29

Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶30

The Management, S1239, Aayipalayam Primary Agricultural Co-op. Credit Society Limited, Athanur (Post), Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District, Pin – 636 301. +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.8356

¶31

W.P.No.11752 of 2019

¶32

MG(CO) RLP(14/02/2022)

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Salem Mandala Anaithu Paniyalargal v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salem Mandala Anaithu Paniyalargal v. The Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Devadoss Vs S. Raja

The General Manager Vs S.Subramanian

G.Balasubramanian Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Salem Mandala Anaithu Paniyalargal Vs The Secretary to Government

The Thennindiya Pazahangudi Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

Dr.K.Silambarasan, Vs The Member Secretary