Disposed

P.Shanmugam v. The District Registrar

Madras HC28 Jan 2022WP/1096/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India where the petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the District Registrar to consider a complaint regarding fraudulent registration of land. The court directed the respondent to issue notices, conduct an enquiry, and pass orders within twelve weeks before disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to issue notice to parties, conduct enquiry, and pass orders within twelve weeks.

P.Shanmugam Vs The District Registrar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.01.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P.NO.1096 OF 2022

¶6

P.Shanmugam ... Petitioner -Vs1. The District Registrar, Registration Department, Villupuram 2. P.Rajendran 3. Selvi ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER:-

¶8

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.11.2021 sent for cancelling the fraudulent registration done in respect of the petitioner's land in SF.No.195/2 situated at Radhapuram Village, Vikravandi Taluk, Villupuram District by the respondents 2 & 3 herein in accordance with law within a stipulated period.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sriram For Respondents For R1 : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Special Government Pleader

¶10

ORDER

¶11

The Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing the first respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.11.2021 sent for cancelling the fraudulent registration done in respect of the petitioner's land in SF.No.195/2 situated at Radhapuram Village, Vikravandi Taluk,

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Villupuram District by the respondents 2 & 3 herein in accordance with law within a stipulated period.

¶14

Heard, Mr.S.Sriram, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent.

¶15

The petitioner lodged complaint dated 30.11.2021 before the first respondent with regards to fraudulent transaction in respect of the property comprised in SF.No.195/2 situated at Radhapuram Village, Vikravandi Taluk, Villupuram District and it is pending.

¶16

Considering the above, the first respondent is directed to issue notice to the petitioner and respondents 2 & 3 herein and conduct enquiry after giving them opportunity of hearing and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶17

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS VII)

¶20

//True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

lok

¶23

¶24

The District Registrar, Registration Department, Villupuram.

¶25

+1cc to Mr.K.Govi Ganesan, Advocate, S.R.No.5439 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.6045

¶26

W.P.NO.1096 OF 2022

¶27

MT(CO) PBS/18/03/2022

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Shanmugam v. The District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Shanmugam v. The District Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thirumallappa Vs The District Revenue Officer

Kalyan Chetty Vs The District Collector

R.Karthikeyan Vs The Inspector General of Registration

S.Sheela Clementina Vs The State rep. by

G.Munivenkatappa Vs The District Revenue Officer

M.Shanthi Vs The Tahsildar