D.Vittobai v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the cause of action for the writ petition ceased to exist as the lease period for mining operations had expired, and the writ petition was accordingly closed without costs.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was closed with no order as to costs, as the lease period for mining operations had expired.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
WP No.10926 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos.9515 to 9517 of 2016
D.Vittobai
Rep. by her Power Agent Mr.D.Deenadayalu Naidu
..Petitioner
vs.
- 1.The District Collector, Office of the Collector, Vellore District, Vellore.
- 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranipet, Vellore District.
- 3.The Commissioner, Department of Geology and Mining, Thiru.vi.ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Vittobai
- respondent
District Collector
- respondent
Revenue Divisional Officer
- respondent
Commissioner, Department of Geology and Mining
- respondent
State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court