“14. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly that one seat was reserved for the appellant and the appellant was permitted to attend the viva voce subject to the outcome of the writ appeal and he has successfully cleared the viva voce and his name finds place in the provisional select list published on 15.03.2021, we are of the view that the benefit of the decision of the Honourable Division Bench in W.P.(MD) No. 19112 of 2020 etc. batch, dated 10.02.2021 should enure in favour of the appellant as well. We say so, because of the facts and circumstances of the case and the appellant had been vigilant in approaching the Court at the earliest point of time and after the dismissal of the writ petition, he had immediately filed the writ appeal, in which an interim direction was granted to reserve one seat. Therefore, the appellant having participated in the selection process, though subject to the outcome of the writ appeal, we are of the view that if the benefit of the order, dated 10.02.2021 in W.P.(MD) Nos.19112 of 2020 etc. batch is not extended to the appellant, it will be inequitable. Admittedly, the selection process is yet to be completed and on account of the appellant being permitted to undergo the medical test, it will in no manner hamper the selection process, which has been completed upto the stage of viva voce and provisional select list has been issued. Therefore, we are of the view that the case of the appellant is quite distinct and different from the other cases, where much after the completion of the selection process,
