The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 as infructuous because the relief sought by the petitioner had already been granted by the respondents after the filing of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.03.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU
W.P.No.10366 of 2017
M.Amuthavalli
... Petitioner
.Vs.
PRAYER:-
Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Second Respondent herein to pass appropriate orders for grant of Group Insurance amount pursuant to the proposal issued by the First Respondent herein on 17.10.2016 within a time frame.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vijay Shankar For Respondents : Mr.Arumugham For Mr.A.S.Thambuswamy (For R1)
Ms.Harini For M/s.M.B.Gopalan Associates (For R2)
O R D E R
The Writ Petition has been filed for directing the Second Respondent to pass appropriate orders for grant of group insurance amount pursuant to the proposal dated 17.10.2016 issued by the First Respondent.
In fine, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Maya
To
W.P.NO.10366 OF 2017
NRL(CO) PBS/09/03/2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Amuthavalli
The Commissioner, Palladam Municipality
The Assistant Divisional Manager, Group and Superannuation Scheme Department
P.D.Audikesavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
