Petitioner filed a miscellaneous petition to condone a 21-day delay in restoring a writ petition. The court noted a new committee was appointed by respondents, finding no merit in the petition and dismissing it.
Petition to condone delay and restore the original writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WMP(MD) No.1858 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Eleventh day of April Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.SARAVANAN
WMP(MD) No.1858 of 2022 IN WP(MD) No.205 of 2016
M.MUTHAR MOHIDEEN
... PETITIONER/PETITIONER
Vs
1 THE CHAIRMAN TAMILNADU WAQF BOARD, NO.1, JAFER SYRANG STREET, VALLAL SEETHAKATHI NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 001
6 SHAIK UDUMAN ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 21 days in restoring the above Writ Petition on the file of this Hon'ble Court.
Prayer in WP(MD). 205/ 2016 :
Pleased to issue writ of Certiorari Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus by call for records relating to impinged order passed by the third respondent and quash the election for the administration of the pallivasal held on 11/12/2015 and direct the
1/2
WMP(MD) No.1858 of 2022
respondents 1 and 2 to conduct fresh election in democratic manner as per the provisions of the Wakf Act.
ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.G.MATHAVAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.G.CHANDRASEKAR, Advocate on behalf of the Respondents No.1 to 3 and Mr.A.HAJA MOHIDEEN, Advocate for the Respondents No.4 to 6, the court made the following order:-
This Writ Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 21 days in restoring the above writ petition.
2.The learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 submits that a new Committee has been appointed on 05.01.2022.
3.Considering the same, there is no merit in the present miscellaneous petition for restoring the writ petition.
4.The Writ Miscellaneous Petition therefore stands dismissed.
sd/11/04/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
ORDER IN WMP(MD) No.1858 of 2022 IN WP(MD) No.205 of 2016 Date :11/04/2022
SA/JM/SAR.1/20.04.2022/2P/1C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a delay of 21 days in restoring a writ petition seeking to quash an election for Waqf Board administration.
M.MUTHAR MOHIDEEN
THE CHAIRMAN TAMILNADU WAQF BOARD, NO.1, JAFER SYRANG STREET, VALLAL SEETHAKATHI NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 001
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TAMIL NADU WAQF BOARD, NO.1, JAFER SYRANG STREET, VALLAL SEETHAKATHI NAGAR, CHENNAI-600 001
THE WAKF INSPECTOR TENKASI
MOHAMED KASIM
PEER MOHIDEEN
C.SARAVANAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
